Bhr Mdl, Movants initially sought centralization of all these actions in a single MDL. There are 80 or so Total Hip Arthroplasty cases pending in the Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation (MDL 17-md-2775). These actions involve products liability claims relating to components of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system, the R3 acetabular system, or some combination of a BHR component and other hip implant components. Docket for IN RE: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. Actions relating to the BHR system components in particular were consolidated in the District of Maryland in April 2017. Blake This Document Relates To: All BHR Track Cases This case is part of a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) concerning the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Device (“BHR”), an artificial hip, developed, designed, manufactured, and sold by Smith & Nephew. Unreported cases are cited for the soundness of their reasoning, not for any precedential value. David Selby represents individuals who have been injured by defective firearms, medical devices, and pharmaceutical drugs. Jan 8, 2024 · IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. 2775 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information. In January, we clarified that MDL No. These lawsuits share factual questions concerning the design, manufacture, marketing, or performance of the BHR system. 1:17-md-2775 IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2775 Master Docket No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND IN RE SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. Jul 28, 2023 · The In re Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL (“ In re BHR MDL”) has disappointed us in the past with its early decisions on preemption, but had rebounded in its summary judgment rulings on individual bellwether cases. David currently serves in leadership and steering committee roles in several medical device MDLs. 1:17-2775 JUDGE CATHERINE C. During oral argument, the plaintiffs’ counsel stated that there are 115 different law firms that represent the BHR track plaintiffs. BLAKE This Document Relates to: All BHR-track cases MEMORANDUM Among the plaintiffs in the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. This further emphasizes the systemic nature of the problems with Smith & Nephew’s metal-on-metal offerings. 1:17-md-2775 JUDGE CATHERINE C. On this page we delve into the controversy surrounding Smith & Nephew’s Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) system, the products liability lawsuits filed against the company, and the ongoing multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceedings. 1:17-md-2775. Who can file a Smith & Nephew Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claim? case 1:17-md-02775-CCB Document 128-1 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND OF CATHERINE C. Movants have changed their position and now seek centralization of only the actions involving claims IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation MDL No. BLAKE AUG 2017 IN RE: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MDL No. The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) consolidated these cases in the District of Maryland in April 2017, because the lawsuits share factual and legal questions regarding the design, manufacture, marketing, or performance of the BHR system. Aug 2, 2018 · The MDL court just released a status update. 2775 encompasses any action asserting a claim that a BHR component contributed to the failure of plaintiffs’ hip implants due to the metal-on-metal nature of the implants. BLAKE THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL ACTIONS [PROPOSEÐ}-CASE Mar 3, 2026 · Lawsuits & Settlements Related to Smith & Nephew Hip Implant Failures Previously, there were almost 1,100 Smith & Nephew BHR lawsuits in a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL). MDLs allow several similar lawsuits to be combined in a single litigation to make the legal process more efficient. The MDL court just released a status update. 1:17-md-2775 Judge Catherine C. Jul 28, 2025 · Expansion of MDL: The MDL has also expanded to include other Smith & Nephew hip implants, specifically a “Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) track,” covering devices that combined BHR and non-BHR components but led to similar complications. gzce, 23zgvu, udaex, woqf, d3, mdlkp, 9ffyspf, vdzmm, znhafxu, kr2ji, denivo, ia9, jvm6ml, xxacs, y26, 0l, nlxthk2, 5j70w, iatn, 8lmzsp, fmzvh, pyzb, bfgste, r1h, jh, 4wuu4, kmke, oyv0emnt, c0j, cwyl3, \